|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
Home > Meeting Minutes > February 6
ECOM Meeting Minutes: 2/6
Brothers in Attendance: Josh, Alyssa, Kyle, Dave Koo, Jim, Brian, Erica, Dave Tu, Paul, Ben, Nathan, & Adrienne
Convened at 7:28pm
President:
1.There will be a Circle K Activities Fair from 5-7pm on 2/11 in the McNeill Room.
2.Dave is looking into adopting a Risk Management Policy…more details to come.
SVP: Chingachgook apparently won’t work as a location for Overnighter. Jim is looking into other options (Frost Valley, Rotary, Sloane, & Bay).
MVP: BBLB has been pushed up to March 2nd.
FVP: I-Banquet this Friday!
*Suddenly…Dave Koo is appointed OM!*
Treasurer: BX made $550 this semester.
RecSec: Um, yeah, I’d better get to that Brotherhood List thing sooner or later…
CorSec: Newsletter articles are due the Wednesday before they come out.
Historian: Nothing to Report.
OM: The new awards will be posted in the outer office.
Old Business:
1.Congrats and thanks to the MMOC Chairs! They are: Charlie (Counting), Shaun (T-Shirts), and Erica (Advertising).
2.Rush—Thanks for helping out and coming to events.
3.LAF—Prepare to be harpooned. Yeah, you laugh…
New Business:
1.Discussion ensued of auctioning unclaimed calculators, power cords, and related items to campus.
2.Also discussed was the issue of the LAF projector. This will be brought up at the brotherhood meeting.
3.At the next brotherhood meeting, a copy card policy will be brought up for a vote (in the meantime, send any suggestions you may have to Kyle). With regards to possession of the copy cards, ideas included restriction to ECOM, upper ECOM, or anyone with a budget.
4.The most significant topic of discussion: the upcoming pledge manual. The major proposed to this year’s edition was the replacement of guidelines with requirements. Some questions and points brought up are as follows (also see Josh’s email):
a.What balance of subjectivity in voting is ideal?
b.Pro: The addition of requirements eliminates the debatable nature of acceptable fulfillment of guidelines.
c.Pro: Requirements would more strictly fit the national and chapter bylaws, as well as national pledging standards, and would be more akin to those of other chapters in the section.
d.Con: Requirements may obscure the devotion of a pledge through areas outside of the pledging standards.
e.Con: Requirements lack flexibility relative to guidelines.
Two motions were made and voted upon. First, a motion to discuss the requirements at the next brotherhood meeting was made and passed 6-1-2. Second, a motion to approve the remainder of the pledge manual passed 8-1-1.
Adjourned way too late for me to have been paying attention.
National Disclaimer: This electronic document is intended for public viewing and is solely for personal reference. It should not be considered an authoritative source nor an official publication of Alpha Phi Omega. Inquiries regarding Alpha Phi Omega and its official publications may be directed to: Alpha Phi Omega, 14901 E. 42nd Street, Independence, MO, 64055 - USA. Alpha Phi Omega is a copyrighted, registered trademark in the USA. All rights reserved. www.apo.org
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
